Premium, Penetration and Where Growth Actually Comes From

Pet health insurance is one of the few consumer insurance lines still compounding at more than 20% a year in a mature market. The North American industry wrote more than $5.2 billion in premium during 2024, up 20.8% from $4.3 billion the year before, according to the NAPHIA State of the Industry Report, 2025. The United States alone crossed $4.7 billion, a 21.4% year-on-year rise (AVMA, 2025).

The number that matters more to a business plan is penetration. At the end of 2024 there were 7.03 million insured pets in North America, roughly 91% of them in the United States and 9% in Canada. That works out to 5.46% of US dogs and 2.04% of US cats, or 4.27% of pets overall (Insurance Business, citing NAPHIA, 2025). Ten years of double-digit growth has taken the category from roughly 1% to roughly 4% of pets. Compare that with the United Kingdom, where insured penetration has hovered around a quarter of dogs for years, and with Sweden, where it sits above two-thirds. Every serious pet health insurance business plan is, at its core, a bet on which of those two ceilings the US is heading toward and how fast.

Average premiums set your revenue per pet

NAPHIA's premium tables are the single most useful public dataset for a founder building revenue assumptions. In 2024 a US accident-and-illness policy averaged $749.29 a year for dogs ($62.44 a month) and $386.47 a year for cats ($32.21 a month). Accident-only cover averaged $16.10 a month for dogs and $9.17 for cats (NAPHIA Average Premiums, 2025). Those four numbers, weighted by the species and product mix you intend to sell, give you a defensible average premium per pet. Investors will check it, so quote the source in the plan rather than rounding to a convenient figure.

The species mix has a bigger effect on the model than most first drafts allow for. A book that is 80% dogs and 20% cats produces an average premium of about $676. Flip that to 60/40 and it falls to roughly $604, an 11% cut to revenue per policy before a single claim is paid. Cats are cheaper to insure and cheaper to treat, so the loss ratio also improves. Show both effects, not just the revenue one.

The UK market runs on a different engine

Britain is a higher-penetration, lower-premium, higher-frequency market. Association of British Insurers members paid a record £1.23 billion in claims during 2024, up 4% on the year and the third consecutive year above £1 billion. That came from 1.8 million notified claims, an all-time high averaging around 4,900 claims a day, split £933 million for dogs, £232 million for cats and £61 million for other pets. The average claim reached £685, up 3% (ABI, 2025).

Behind that claims figure sits a veterinary cost problem the Competition and Markets Authority has now formally documented. Average prices for veterinary services rose 63% between January 2016 and December 2023 while general services inflation was 32%, and the Office for National Statistics recorded 9.1% inflation for vets and other pet services in 2024. The CMA also found that more than 60% of UK veterinary practices are owned by six corporate groups, that trust in fair pricing sits at 55% for independent practices against 33% for the large groups, and that medicine prices at group-owned online pharmacies can be 50% to 60% below the same groups' own first-opinion practices (ABI analysis of the CMA veterinary services report, 2026).

For a UK founder this is the most important paragraph in the whole plan. Claims severity is being driven by supplier concentration, not by pet owners claiming more often, and the CMA's remedies will change the trajectory in ways nobody can yet price precisely. A plan that models UK claims inflation at a flat 4% will not survive an underwriting review. A plan that models it at 8% to 10% with an explicit sensitivity table on the CMA remedies will.

Concentration at the top, room underneath

Globally the market was valued at around USD 14.2 billion in 2025, with the top five providers, Trupanion, Nationwide, Fetch by The Dodo, ASPCA Pet Health Insurance and Anicom, holding roughly 40% between them and Trupanion alone above 12% (GM Insights, 2026). That leaves about 60% of premium spread across dozens of brands, most of them distributing on someone else's paper. Concentration at the top is not the barrier a first-time founder assumes it is. The barrier is claims-cost credibility, and that is a modelling problem before it is a capital problem.

One structural feature is worth building the whole go-to-market around: the employer channel. Depending on the survey, between 22% and 33% of US employers now offer pet insurance as a voluntary benefit, and adoption reaches about 36% among firms with more than 500 employees (HR Dive, citing SHRM and Gallagher, 2025). Voluntary-benefit enrolment carries payroll deduction, lower lapse rates and a distribution partner who already has the employee relationship. Very few early-stage plans model it.

Six Questions Founders Ask Before They Write the Plan

These come up in almost every first call. Answering them properly in the plan removes the most common reasons an underwriter or investor stops reading.

How do pet health insurance companies actually make money?

Two ways, and they are not the same business. A carrier earns the underwriting margin, the gap between premium collected and claims plus expenses paid, and it earns investment income on reserves held between premium receipt and claim payment. A managing general agent or agency earns commission on premium it places, plus fees, plus a share of underwriting profit if the programme beats its target loss ratio. Almost every new pet health insurance brand you have heard of in the last decade is the second kind wearing the first kind's branding.

What is the difference between pet health insurance and a pet wellness plan?

Insurance indemnifies you against uncertain future loss: accident, illness, surgery, diagnostics. A wellness or routine-care plan prepays predictable spending such as vaccinations, dental cleaning and flea treatment, and is closer to a subscription than a policy. The distinction is commercially convenient and legally mandatory. Several states that have adopted the NAIC Pet Insurance Model Act require wellness programmes to be described and disclosed separately from the insurance product. Blur the two in your marketing and you create a filing problem.

Do you need to be an insurance company to sell pet health insurance?

No, and most founders should not try. The three viable structures are an agency or producer selling other carriers' products for 10% to 20% commission, a managing general agent with delegated underwriting and claims authority under a fronting carrier's licence earning 25% to 35% override, and a full carrier holding its own licence and capital. Industry guidance puts the capital saving of the MGA route at roughly 60% to 80% versus launching as a licensed carrier (Insurnest, 2026).

Why does pet health insurance never cover pre-existing conditions?

Because the product is priced on the assumption that the insured event has not yet happened. Once a condition is diagnosed, the expected cost of treating it is close to certain, and certainty is not insurable at a premium anyone would pay. Practically, this shapes acquisition strategy: enrolment skews heavily to puppies and kittens, and the highest-value distribution point is the moment a pet is acquired or first presented at a clinic. That is why the vet-clinic channel is worth so much more than a price comparison click.

How much capital do you need to launch a pet health insurance brand?

Industry sources put a typical MGA launch at $850,000 to $2.4 million from entity formation through breakeven, with breakeven arriving 18 to 36 months after first policy issued (Insurnest, 2026). An agency-only launch on someone else's product, in one or two states or as a UK appointed representative, can be done for a fraction of that. The template below models both.

What reimbursement rate and deductible should a new product use?

Market convention is a 70% to 90% reimbursement rate after an annual deductible of $100 to $1,000, with an annual payout limit and a waiting period of a day or two for accidents and around 14 days for illness. Those four dials are your pricing levers. A 90% reimbursement with a $100 deductible is a materially different risk than 70% with $750, and it will attract a different customer. State that choice explicitly in the plan and connect it to your target loss ratio rather than copying a competitor's page.

What It Costs to Put a Pet Health Insurance Product on the Market

Capital requirements in this category are driven almost entirely by structure, not by scale. Below are working ranges for a US launch with a fronting carrier and a UK launch under the appointed representative route, drawn from the vendor and licensing costs described in the sections that follow. Treat the lower bound as a single-state or single-principal launch and the upper bound as a multi-state programme with proprietary rating.

Line-item cost breakdown

• Producer and MGA licensing: $8K–$45K (£1.5K–£25K). Resident and non-resident property and casualty licences run $50 to $300 per state plus exams and fingerprinting, before legal time.
• Actuarial pricing and rate filing support: $45K–$180K (£35K–£140K). This is the line first-time founders cut and then have to reinstate when the carrier asks for a pricing memorandum.
• Policy administration and claims platform: $60K–$400K (£45K–£320K) in year one, depending on whether you configure a cloud-native system or implement an enterprise suite.
• Fronting carrier fees and collateral: $75K–$600K (£60K–£480K). Fronting fees are usually a percentage of gross written premium, so this scales with the book rather than sitting flat.
• Reinsurance broking and quota-share placement: $25K–$120K (£20K–£95K).
• Compliance, E&O cover, legal and policy wording: $30K–$150K (£25K–£120K), including the carrier agreement and any third-party administrator contracts.
• Distribution build: $40K–$500K (£30K–£400K), covering veterinary field representatives, comparison-site listing fees, and benefits-broker onboarding.
• Working capital to breakeven: $120K–$900K (£95K–£720K) across the 18 to 36 month runway.

Funding routes that actually fit this category

In the United States, insurance agencies and brokerages sit under NAICS 524210, where the SBA size standard is $15 million in average annual receipts over the preceding five fiscal years (NAICS Association). That matters because it keeps almost every new pet health insurance agency comfortably inside SBA eligibility for a 7(a) loan of up to $5 million. SBA lenders are generally comfortable with commission-based agency revenue, which is contracted and renewable, and considerably less comfortable with underwriting risk. If you are building an agency, lead with the 7(a) route. If you are building an MGA that takes a share of underwriting result, expect lenders to treat that portion as equity risk and structure accordingly.

In the United Kingdom, a Start Up Loan of up to £25,000 per founder at 6% fixed is realistic seed capital for an appointed representative launch and can be stacked across a founding team. Beyond that, the natural funders of this category are insurance-specialist angels, program-focused venture funds and the fronting carrier itself, which sometimes takes equity or a profit-commission structure in lieu of a higher fronting fee. Crowdfunding works poorly here because retail investors cannot evaluate a loss triangle.

A note on how funders read these plans: an InsurTech Association piece drawing on more than 3,000 MGA business plans reports that fronting carriers reject over 60% of programme submissions because the plan lacks institutional-grade actuarial support (InsurTech Association). The recommendation there is blunt and worth repeating: do not simply assert a loss ratio, explain how you will achieve it, what happens if you miss it, and what sensitivity analysis you have run.

The Vendor Stack You Will Actually Be Buying

Unlike most small businesses, a pet health insurance venture buys almost nothing physical and almost everything contractual. Naming the vendors you have shortlisted, with indicative implementation timelines, is one of the fastest ways to make an early-stage plan look operationally serious. These are the categories and the systems that come up repeatedly in this line.

• Socotra: cloud-native, API-first policy administration favoured by startups for speed of configuration, with implementations commonly quoted at three to six months. Strongest choice when you expect to iterate product wording and rating frequently in the first two years.
• Britecore: the other common cloud-native option at launch stage, with a similar implementation profile to Socotra and a property and casualty heritage.
• Majesco: the most out-of-the-box functionality of the MGA-oriented platforms, including built-in customer and agent portals, which removes a portal build from your year-one roadmap.
• EIS Group: architecture aimed at MGAs planning to scale well past 100,000 policies, so relevant if your plan reaches six-figure policy counts inside five years.
• Duck Creek Technologies: offers a pet line-of-business accelerator with coverages, rates, rules and workflows available out of the box and low-code configuration, plus claims handling from first notice of loss through adjudication and payment (Duck Creek). The pet-specific accelerator is genuinely unusual among enterprise suites.
• Origami Risk: a unified SaaS platform covering digital underwriting, rating, billing, claims, analytics and portals, aimed squarely at MGAs and programme administrators.
• Fronting and programme carriers: the licensed balance sheet your policies are written on. Expect to negotiate the fronting fee as a percentage of gross written premium, the collateral or trust requirement, and how much underwriting authority is genuinely delegated.
• Reinsurance brokers: place the quota-share treaty that limits your net exposure. Their appetite for a new pet programme is a leading indicator of whether your pricing is credible.
• Third-party claims administrators: an alternative to building claims in-house in year one. The trade is speed and lower fixed cost against slower feedback on loss trends, which is exactly the data your rate actions depend on.
• Distribution platforms: comparison and recommendation services such as Pawlicy Advisor sit between the pet owner and the product, and veterinary practice management integrations put your quote in front of an owner at the clinic.

Two vendor decisions deserve dedicated pages in the plan. The first is the fronting carrier, because that contract determines your override, your collateral posting and how quickly you can change price. The second is the policy administration platform, because switching it after 20,000 policies are on the books is a project nobody budgets for. Model both as multi-year commitments, not as line items.

Commission, Loss Ratio and the Renewal Book

The most common modelling error in a pet health insurance business plan is treating gross written premium as revenue. It is not. If you are an MGA or an agency, premium flows through you to the carrier, and your revenue is the commission plus fees plus any profit share. Presenting a $15 million premium book as $15 million of revenue is the single fastest way to lose credibility with anyone who has read an insurance plan before.

Where an intermediary's income comes from

• Override commission on gross written premium: typically 25% to 35% for an MGA with delegated authority, 10% to 20% for a straight agency placing another carrier's product.
• Policy and administration fees: a flat monthly or annual fee per policy, often $2 to $4, that does not move with claims experience.
• Profit commission: a share of the margin when the programme runs below the carrier's target loss ratio. This is where an MGA's upside actually sits.
• Claims administration fees: if you handle claims rather than outsourcing them, a fee per claim or per policy.
• Ancillary products: wellness and routine-care subscriptions, telehealth, and prescription discount programmes, which carry no underwriting risk and improve retention.

Loss ratio is the number the whole plan hangs on

Loss ratio is claims paid divided by premium earned. Add the expense ratio and you get the combined ratio, where anything below 100% means the programme made an underwriting profit. Trupanion, the category leader, runs an unusual and openly stated model that deliberately targets around a 70% claims payout, leaving roughly 30% for all expenses and margin, and reported its expense ratio falling from 6.2% to 5.6% across the second half of 2025 (Trupanion Q4 2025 earnings call transcript). Most pet programmes target a combined ratio near 100%, meaning the intermediary makes its money on fees and volume rather than on underwriting alone.

Two structural features of pet insurance loss ratios have to be in the model. First, loss ratio varies enormously by breed and by age. A three-year-old domestic shorthair and a seven-year-old French bulldog are not the same risk, and averaging them hides the problem rather than solving it. Second, a book ages. Claims frequency and severity both rise as the insured population gets older, so a programme that looks profitable in year one at a 62% loss ratio can be at 78% by year four on identical pricing. Rate actions, and the regulatory calendar for filing them, belong in the operating plan.

Worked unit economics: a 20,000-pet book

Assume 20,000 in-force pets at the NAPHIA-derived average accident-and-illness premium of roughly $748 a year, giving $14.96 million in gross written premium. At a 28% override, commission income is $4.19 million. Add a $2.50 per policy per month administration fee, which contributes $600,000, and gross revenue reaches roughly $4.79 million.

Against that, a realistic cost base at this scale is around $3.4 million: platform and hosting, a claims team or TPA fees, compliance and actuarial retainers, marketing, and roughly 25 to 35 staff-equivalents across service and operations. That leaves approximately $1.39 million of EBITDA before profit commission, a margin of about 29% on commission revenue and 9.3% of premium. If the programme lands at a 68% loss ratio against a 72% target, a 25% profit-commission share on that four-point saving adds roughly $150,000.

Now stress it. Lose four points of loss ratio in the wrong direction, to 76%, and the profit commission disappears entirely while the carrier starts pressing for a rate increase you cannot file for six months. Lose 12% of the book to lapse instead of the 8% you assumed, and you need to acquire 800 additional pets a year just to stand still, at whatever your acquisition cost happens to be. Both of those scenarios belong in the plan as tables, not as reassuring sentences.

Acquisition cost is the real differentiator

Pet health insurance is a subscription business with a long payback. If your blended acquisition cost is $180 per pet and your annual commission per pet is $210, you are profitable in month eleven and handsomely so by year three, assuming the pet stays. If acquisition costs $320, which is entirely achievable on paid search against incumbents with nine-figure marketing budgets, the arithmetic breaks. This is why the distribution route you choose matters more than the product design.

Three routes, three cost structures. Direct-to-consumer digital acquisition is fast to launch and expensive to sustain, because you are bidding against Trupanion, Nationwide, Lemonade Pet and Healthy Paws for the same clicks. Veterinary clinic embedded distribution is slow to build and cheap to run: the clinic is present at the moment of enrolment, pre-existing conditions have not yet accumulated, and referral economics beat auction economics. The employer voluntary-benefits channel is slowest of all to open, requiring benefits-broker relationships and an enrolment calendar, but it delivers payroll deduction, group-level enrolment and materially lower lapse. Model all three separately with their own CAC, conversion and retention assumptions. A blended average conceals which one is actually funding the business.

Where You Sell Changes What You Earn

Premium in this category is not national. It tracks local veterinary cost, urban density and state regulation, and the spread is wide enough to change which markets you should open first. For the same two-year-old mixed-breed dog, quotes range from about $27 a month in Grand Rapids, Michigan to about $63 a month in New York City. California and New York are the most expensive states for dog cover at around $61 a month, while California and Connecticut top the table for cats at about $32. Mississippi is consistently the cheapest state, and the cheapest markets cluster through the Midwest and South, while the Northeast, including Massachusetts, Delaware and Washington DC, sits at the top alongside Alaska (Pawlicy Advisor, 2026; The Zebra).

The underlying driver is veterinary pricing. An average veterinary visit costs roughly $71.95 in California, $66.60 in New York and $57.65 in Michigan. Higher premium is compensation for higher expected claims, not free margin, which is exactly why a state-selection strategy has to look at the ratio rather than the headline premium.

A practical sequencing point: you do not have to launch in 50 states. Many programmes open in three to eight states, prove the loss ratio, then expand once the carrier is comfortable. That approach cuts the licensing and form-filing bill dramatically and gets you to a credible loss triangle faster. Say so explicitly in the plan, because reviewers read a 50-state day-one launch as inexperience rather than ambition.

In the UK the equivalent variable is not geography but breed and vet-group exposure. Because more than 60% of practices belong to six corporate groups, your claims cost is partly determined by which groups your policyholders' local practices belong to. That is an unusual and genuinely defensible piece of analysis to put in a UK plan.

Licensing and Regulation in the US, UK and Australia

Regulation in this category is jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction and it sets your launch calendar more tightly than any commercial decision. Below are the specific regimes and realistic timelines.

United States

• Resident and non-resident producer licences in every state where policies are sold, coordinated through NIPR. Budget $50 to $300 per state plus exam and fingerprinting, two to eight weeks per state, and four to six months for a full 50-state footprint.
• MGA registration under the NAIC Managing General Agents Model Act (#225), which most states have adopted with variations. In most states an MGA must be licensed as a producer and cannot place business until a written contract exists among all parties.
• NAIC Pet Insurance Model Act (#633) compliance. Adopting states include Maine (2022), Louisiana (2023), Mississippi (2023), Nebraska (2023), New Hampshire (2023), Maryland (2024), Pennsylvania (2024) and Ohio (2025), with Montana and Rhode Island pending as of 2025 (NAIC model law state page 633). The Act governs disclosure, pre-existing condition definitions, waiting periods and the separation of wellness programmes from insurance.
• Policy form and rate filings submitted through SERFF, usually by the fronting carrier on your behalf. Allow 30 to 120 days per state, with deemer periods varying.
• Errors and omissions cover and, if you handle premium, fiduciary trust account requirements.

Because the Model Act is adopted with state-level modifications, there is no single national compliance standard. Plans that assume one get caught at the first filing.

United Kingdom

• FCA authorisation as a general insurance intermediary, or the appointed representative route under an authorised principal firm. Any firm arranging or underwriting pet insurance in the UK must be authorised or be an AR (FCA).
• Timelines: direct authorisation typically takes six to twelve months against a twelve-month statutory deadline, with most complete applications decided in six to nine. The appointed representative route can be live in four to twelve weeks.
• Application fees are banded by category; general insurance intermediary applications commonly fall into Category 4 on the FCA's published scale, which runs from £280 at category 1 to £225,170 at category 10 (FCA authorisation fees).
• Capital resources: insurance intermediaries need a minimum equivalent to EUR 25,000, with higher requirements where client money is held or binding authority is granted.
• Consumer Duty and product governance: annual fair value assessments on the pet product, plus clear disclosure of exclusions and waiting periods.
• CMA veterinary remedies: the Competition and Markets Authority's veterinary services investigation is producing pricing transparency and comparison obligations that will move claims costs. A UK plan should model this as a range, not a point estimate.

For most UK founders the honest recommendation is to launch as an appointed representative, prove the distribution channel and the loss experience for 18 months, and apply for direct authorisation once there is a trading record to submit. It costs less, starts sooner and produces a stronger application.

Australia and Canada

• Australia: pet insurance is written as general insurance under a twin-peaks regime. Underwriters must be APRA-authorised under the Insurance Act 1973, while distributors and managing general agents generally need an Australian Financial Services licence from ASIC under the Corporations Act 2001, along with AFCA membership and compensation arrangements under RG 126. Products also sit under the Insurance Contracts Act 1984, the General Insurance Code of Practice and the Insurance Council of Australia's voluntary Pet Insurance Code of Practice, which sets expectations on pre-existing condition definitions, waiting periods and claims handling. APRA granted PetSure a general insurance licence in March 2023, which is a useful reference point for what a de novo authorisation looks like in that market.
• Canada: around 9% of the North American insured-pet base, with 2024 penetration of 5.57% for dogs and 1.76% for cats. Licensing is provincial rather than federal, so FSRA in Ontario, the AMF in Quebec and the Insurance Council of BC each have to be satisfied separately. Treat Canadian expansion as a province-by-province exercise on the same model as US state licensing.

Whichever jurisdiction you start in, put the licensing calendar in the plan as a Gantt chart with named regulators and realistic durations. Underwriters and investors both read that page as a proxy for whether the founder has done this before.

Terms Your Carrier Term Sheet Will Use

Most first-time founders in this category come from veterinary practice, pet retail or consumer technology rather than from insurance. The vocabulary below is what a fronting carrier, a reinsurance broker and a state regulator will assume you already know. Getting it right in the plan is a credibility signal in itself.

• Gross written premium (GWP): the total premium charged to policyholders before commission, reinsurance or claims. Not your revenue if you are an intermediary.
• Loss ratio: claims incurred divided by premium earned. The core measure of whether the product is priced correctly.
• Combined ratio: loss ratio plus expense ratio. Below 100% is an underwriting profit; above 100% means the programme relies on fees or investment income.
• Fronting or programme carrier: a licensed insurer that lends its licence, statutory capital and regulatory filings so that a programme can be written on its paper.
• Delegated authority: the contractual permission from a carrier to underwrite, bind, price or handle claims on its behalf, defined in a binder agreement with strict limits.
• Override commission: the percentage of gross written premium paid to the MGA for producing and administering the business.
• Profit commission: an additional payment triggered when the programme's loss ratio comes in below an agreed target.
• Quota share: a reinsurance arrangement in which a fixed percentage of premium and losses is ceded to a reinsurer, reducing volatility and capital strain.
• Reimbursement rate: the share of an eligible vet bill the policy pays after the deductible, conventionally between 70% and 90%.
• Annual limit: the maximum the policy will reimburse in a twelve-month policy period once the deductible is met.
• Waiting period: the interval between policy inception and cover taking effect. Commonly a day or two for accidents and around fourteen days for illness.
• Pre-existing condition: any condition diagnosed or showing symptoms before cover began or during the waiting period, and universally excluded.
• Lapse rate: the percentage of policies not renewed each year. In a subscription model with a long payback period, this is the number that decides whether growth compounds.

Sample Business Plan Preview

A preview of the structure and financial outputs a buyer receives. The mockups below use the same assumptions applied throughout this page.

What's in the Template

Every Avvale business plan template includes these sections, pre-structured for your industry:

• Executive Summary — Your business at a glance, written to hook investors in 60 seconds
• Company Overview — Legal structure, ownership, location, and founding story
• Industry Analysis — Market size, growth trends, and the regulatory picture
• Customer Analysis — Target demographics, pain points, and spending patterns
• Competitor Analysis — Competitive mapping and your differentiation strategy
• Marketing Plan — Channels, messaging, and customer acquisition strategy
• Operations Plan — Day-to-day workflows, staffing structure, and key milestones
• Management Team — Founder bios, advisory board, and key hires planned

For a pet health insurance plan we normally extend the standard structure with four additions: a licensing and filings calendar by jurisdiction, a loss-ratio build by breed and age cohort, a distribution-channel comparison with separate acquisition-cost assumptions, and a carrier or principal-firm strategy setting out who your paper comes from and on what terms. If you are writing it yourself, add those four sections manually.

The optional Financial Forecast add-on (included in our $300/£250 and $1,000/£800 packages) provides a 5-year Excel model with income statement, cash flow, balance sheet, break-even analysis, and startup capital requirements.

Related guides worth reading alongside this one: the pet insurance business plan template covers the MGA versus carrier decision in more depth, the veterinary clinic business plan template is useful if your distribution strategy involves practice partnerships, and the life insurance brokerage business plan template shows how commission-based intermediary models are presented to lenders. You can also browse our client case studies or read about working with an Avvale business plan writer.

Frequently Asked Questions

Useful Links & Resources

These links were preserved from the live page so important references and partner links are not lost during the page refresh.

• Facebook
• Instagram
• LinkedIn
• YouTube